3D Pointing Devices and Methods

ABSTRACT

Systems and methods according to the present invention address these needs and others by providing a handheld device, e.g., a 3D pointing device, which uses at least one sensor to detect motion of the handheld device. The detected motion can then be mapped into a desired output, e.g., cursor movement.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/398,873, filed Jan. 5, 2017, which is continuation of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/041,348, filed Feb. 11, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No.9,575,570, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.11/820,525, filed Jun. 20, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,261,978, which is adivisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/119,663,filed May 2, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,239,301, which claims the benefitof U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. (i) 60/566,444. filed onApr. 30, 2004, entitled “Freespace Pointing Device”, (ii) 60/612,571,filed on Sep. 23, 2004, entitled “Free Space Pointing Devices andMethods”, (iii) 60/641,383, filed on Jan. 5, 2005, entitled “Methods andDevices for Removing Unintentional Movement in Free Space PointingDevices”, (iv) 60/641,410, filed on Jan. 5, 2005, entitled “FreespacePointing Devices and Methods for Using Same”, and (v) 60/641,405, filedon Jan. 5, 2005, entitled “Handheld Remote Control Device”; all of whichare incorporated herein by reference. This application is also relatedto U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/119,987, 11/119,719, and11/119,688, entitled “Methods and Devices for Removing UnintentionalMovement in 3D Pointing Devices”, “3D Pointing Devices with OrientationCompensation and Improved Usability”, “Methods and Devices forIdentifying Users Based on Tremor”, all of which were filed concurrentlywith U.S. application Ser. No. 11/119,663, filed May 2, 2005 and all ofwhich are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND

The present invention describes three-dimensional (hereinafter “3D”)pointing techniques, systems and devices, as well as some techniques anddevices which are usable in other types of handheld devices.

Technologies associated with the communication of information haveevolved rapidly over the last several decades. Television, cellulartelephony, the Internet and optical communication techniques (to namejust a few things) combine to inundate consumers with availableinformation and entertainment options. Taking television as an example,the last three decades have seen the introduction of cable televisionservice, satellite television service, pay-per-view movies andvideo-on-demand. Whereas television viewers of the 1960s could typicallyreceive perhaps four or five over-the-air TV channels on theirtelevision sets, today's TV watchers have the opportunity to select fromhundreds, thousands, and potentially millions of channels of shows andinformation. Video-on-demand technology, currently used primarily inhotels and the like, provides the potential for in-home entertainmentselection from among thousands of movie titles.

The technological ability to provide so much information and content toend users provides both opportunities and challenges to system designersand service providers. One challenge is that while end users typicallyprefer having more choices rather than fewer, this preference iscounterweighted by their desire that the selection process be both fastand simple. Unfortunately, the development of the systems and interfacesby which end users access media items has resulted in selectionprocesses which are neither fast nor simple. Consider again the exampleof television programs. When television was in its infancy, determiningwhich program to watch was a relatively simple process primarily due tothe small number of choices. One would consult a printed guide which wasformatted, for example, as series of columns and rows which showed thecorrespondence between (1) nearby television channels, (2) programsbeing transmitted on those channels and (3) date and time. Thetelevision was tuned to the desired channel by adjusting a tuner knoband the viewer watched the selected program. Later, remote controldevices were introduced that permitted viewers to tune the televisionfrom a distance. This addition to the user-television interface createdthe phenomenon known as “channel surfing” whereby a viewer could rapidlyview short segments being broadcast on a number of channels to quicklylearn what programs were available at any given time.

Despite the fact that the number of channels and amount of viewablecontent has dramatically increased, the generally available userinterface, control device options and frameworks for televisions has notchanged much over the last 30 years. Printed guides are still the mostprevalent mechanism for conveying programming information. The multiplebutton remote control with up and down arrows is still the mostprevalent channel/content selection mechanism. The reaction of those whodesign and implement the TV user interface to the increase in availablemedia content has been a straightforward extension of the existingselection procedures and interface objects. Thus, the number of rows inthe printed guides has been increased to accommodate more channels. Thenumber of buttons on the remote control devices has been increased tosupport additional functionality and content handling, e.g., as shown inFIG. 1. However, this approach has significantly increased both the timerequired for a viewer to review the available information and thecomplexity of actions required to implement a selection. Arguably, thecumbersome nature of the existing interface has hampered commercialimplementation of some services, e.g., video-on-demand, since consumersare resistant to new services that will add complexity to an interfacethat they view as already too slow and complex.

In addition to increases in bandwidth and content, the user interfacebottleneck problem is being exacerbated by the aggregation oftechnologies. Consumers are reacting positively to having the option ofbuying integrated systems rather than a number of segregable components.An example of this trend is the combination television/VCR/DVD in whichthree previously independent components are frequently sold today as anintegrated unit. This trend is likely to continue, potentially with anend result that most if not all of the communication devices currentlyfound in the household will be packaged together as an integrated unit,e.g., a television/VCR/DVD/internet access/radio/stereo unit. Even thosewho continue to buy separate components will likely desire seamlesscontrol of, and interworking between, the separate components. With thisincreased aggregation comes the potential for more complexity in theuser interface. For example, when so-called “universal” remote unitswere introduced, e.g., to combine the functionality of TV remote unitsand VCR remote units, the number of buttons on these universal remoteunits was typically more than the number of buttons on either the TVremote unit or VCR remote unit individually. This added number ofbuttons and functionality makes it very difficult to control anythingbut the simplest aspects of a TV or VCR without hunting for exactly theright button on the remote. Many times, these universal remotes do notprovide enough buttons to access many levels of control or featuresunique to certain TVs. In these cases, the original device remote unitis still needed, and the original hassle of handling multiple remotesremains due to user interface issues arising from the complexity ofaggregation. Some remote units have addressed this problem by adding“soft” buttons that can be programmed with the expert commands. Thesesoft buttons sometimes have accompanying LCD displays to indicate theiraction. These too have the flaw that they are difficult to use withoutlooking away from the TV to the remote control. Yet another flaw inthese remote units is the use of modes in an attempt to reduce thenumber of buttons. In these “moded” universal remote units, a specialbutton exists to select whether the remote should communicate with theTV, DVD player, cable set-top box, VCR, etc. This causes many usabilityissues including sending commands to the wrong device, forcing the userto look at the remote to make sure that it is in the right mode, and itdoes not provide any simplification to the integration of multipledevices. The most advanced of these universal remote units provide someintegration by allowing the user to program sequences of commands tomultiple devices into the remote. This is such a difficult task thatmany users hire professional installers to program their universalremote units.

Some attempts have also been made to modernize the screen interfacebetween end users and media systems. However, these attempts typicallysuffer from, among other drawbacks, an inability to easily scale betweenlarge collections of media items and small collections of media items.For example, interfaces which rely on lists of items may work well forsmall collections of media items, but are tedious to browse for largecollections of media items. Interfaces which rely on hierarchicalnavigation (e.g., tree structures) may be speedier to traverse than listinterfaces for large collections of media items, but are not readilyadaptable to small collections of media items. Additionally, users tendto lose interest in selection processes wherein the user has to movethrough three or more layers in a tree structure. For all of thesecases, current remote units make this selection processor even moretedious by forcing the user to repeatedly depress the up and downbuttons to navigate the list or hierarchies. When selection skippingcontrols are available such as page up and page down, the user usuallyhas to look at the remote to find these special buttons or be trained toknow that they even exist. Accordingly, organizing frameworks,techniques and systems which simplify the control and screen interfacebetween users and media systems as well as accelerate the selectionprocess, while at the same time permitting service providers to takeadvantage of the increases in available bandwidth to end user equipmentby facilitating the supply of a large number of media items and newservices to the user have been proposed in U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/768,432, filed on Jan. 30, 2004, entitled “A Control Frameworkwith a Zoomable Graphical User Interface for Organizing, Selecting andLaunching Media Items”, the disclosure of which is incorporated here byreference.

Of particular interest for this specification are the remote devicesusable to interact with such frameworks, as well as other applicationsand systems. As mentioned in the above-incorporated application, variousdifferent types of remote devices can be used with such frameworksincluding, for example, trackballs, “mouse”-type pointing devices, lightpens, etc. However, another category of remote devices which can be usedwith such frameworks (and other applications) is 3D pointing devices.The phrase “3D pointing” is used in this specification to refer to theability of an input device to move in three (or more) dimensions in theair in front of, e.g., a display screen, and the corresponding abilityof the user interface to translate those motions directly into userinterface commands, e.g., movement of a cursor on the display screen.The transfer of data between the 3D pointing device may be performedwirelessly or via a wire connecting the 3D pointing device to anotherdevice. Thus “3D pointing” differs from, e.g., conventional computermouse pointing techniques which use a surface, e.g., a desk surface ormousepad, as a proxy surface from which relative movement of the mouseis translated into cursor movement on the computer display screen. Anexample of a 3D pointing device can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,440,326.

The '326 patent describes, among other things, a vertical gyroscopeadapted for use as a pointing device for controlling the position of acursor on the display of a computer. A motor at the core of thegyroscope is suspended by two pairs of orthogonal gimbals from ahand-held controller device and nominally oriented with its spin axisvertical by a pendulous device. Electro-optical shaft angle encoderssense the orientation of a hand-held controller device as it ismanipulated by a user and the resulting electrical output is convertedinto a format usable by a computer to control the movement of a cursoron the screen of the computer display.

However, there is significant room for improvement in the area ofhandheld device design, generally, and 3D pointer design, morespecifically.

SUMMARY

Systems and methods according to the present invention address theseneeds and others by providing a handheld device, e.g., a 3D pointingdevice, which uses at least one sensor to detect motion of the handhelddevice. The detected motion can then be mapped into a desired output,e.g., cursor movement.

According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, apointing device includes a first rotational sensor for determiningrotation of the pointing device about a first axis and generating afirst rotational output associated therewith, a second rotational sensorfor determining rotation of the pointing device about a second axis andgenerating a second rotational output associated therewith, anaccelerometer for determining an acceleration of the pointing device andoutputting an acceleration output associated therewith and a processingunit for modifying the first and second rotational outputs based on theacceleration and for generating an output based on the modified firstand second rotational outputs.

According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, amethod for controlling a 3D pointing includes the steps of detecting alack of movement associated with the 3D pointing device and placing the3D pointing device into a reduced power state as a result of thedetecting step.

According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention,a method for controlling a system includes the steps of detectingmovement associated with a device, determining if the movement indicatesthat the device is currently being held by a user; and controlling thesystem based on a result of the determining step.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings illustrate exemplary embodiments of thepresent invention, wherein:

FIG. 1 depicts a conventional remote control unit for an entertainmentsystem;

FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary media system in which exemplary embodimentsof the present invention can be implemented;

FIG. 3 shows a 3D pointing device according to an exemplary embodimentof the present invention;

FIG. 4 illustrates a cutaway view of the 3D pointing device in FIG. 4including two rotational sensors and one accelerometer;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating processing of data associatedwith 3D pointing devices according to an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIGS. 6(a)-6(d) illustrate the effects of tilt;

FIG. 7 depicts a hardware architecture of a 3D pointing device accordingto an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a state diagram depicting a stationary detection mechanismaccording to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a flow chart illustrating a method of identifying a user basedon detected hand tremor of a handheld device according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 10(a)-10(d) are plots of frequency domain tremor data collected aspart of a test of an exemplary method and device for identifying a userbased on hand tremor according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 11 is a graph plotting eigenvalues associated with a method foridentifying a user based on hand tremor according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 12 is a graph illustrating class separation results associated withan exemplary method for identifying users based on hand tremor accordingto an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating transformation of sensed motiondata from a first frame of reference into a second frame of referenceaccording to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 14 graphically illustrates the transformation of sensed motion datafrom a first frame of reference into a second frame of referenceaccording to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 15 is a block diagram illustrating a system for removingunintentional movement from detected motion according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 16 depicts various examples of detected movement associated withfine button clicking and coarse button clicking.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description of the invention refers to theaccompanying drawings. The same reference numbers in different drawingsidentify the same or similar elements. Also, the following detaileddescription does not limit the invention. Instead, the scope of theinvention is defined by the appended claims.

In order to provide some context for this discussion, an exemplaryaggregated media system 200 in which the present invention can beimplemented will first be described with respect to FIG. 2. Thoseskilled in the art will appreciate, however, that the present inventionis not restricted to implementation in this type of media system andthat more or fewer components can be included therein. Therein, aninput/output (I/O) bus 210 connects the system components in the mediasystem 200 together. The I/O bus 210 represents any of a number ofdifferent of mechanisms and techniques for routing signals between themedia system components. For example, the I/O bus 210 may include anappropriate number of independent audio “patch” cables that route audiosignals, coaxial cables that route video signals, two-wire serial linesor infrared or radio frequency transceivers that route control signals,optical fiber or any other routing mechanisms that route other types ofsignals.

In this exemplary embodiment, the media system 200 includes atelevision/monitor 212, a video cassette recorder (VCR) 214, digitalvideo disk (DVD) recorder/playback device 216, audio/video tuner 218 andcompact disk player 220 coupled to the I/O bus 210. The VCR 214, DVD 216and compact disk player 220 may be single disk or single cassettedevices, or alternatively may be multiple disk or multiple cassettedevices. They may be independent units or integrated together. Inaddition, the media system 200 includes a microphone/speaker system 222,video camera 224 and a wireless I/O control device 226. According toexemplary embodiments of the present invention, the wireless I/O controldevice 226 is a 3D pointing device according to one of the exemplaryembodiments described below. The wireless I/O control device 226 cancommunicate with the entertainment system 200 using, e.g., an IR or RFtransmitter or transceiver. Alternatively, the I/O control device can beconnected to the entertainment system 200 via a wire.

The entertainment system 200 also includes a system controller 228.According to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, thesystem controller 228 operates to store and display entertainment systemdata available from a plurality of entertainment system data sources andto control a wide variety of features associated with each of the systemcomponents. As shown in FIG. 2, system controller 228 is coupled, eitherdirectly or indirectly, to each of the system components, as necessary,through I/O bus 210. In one exemplary embodiment, in addition to or inplace of I/O bus 210, system controller 228 is configured with awireless communication transmitter (or transceiver), which is capable ofcommunicating with the system components via IR signals or RF signals.Regardless of the control medium, the system controller 228 isconfigured to control the media components of the media system 200 via agraphical user interface described below.

As further illustrated in FIG. 2, media system 200 may be configured toreceive media items from various media sources and service providers. Inthis exemplary embodiment, media system 200 receives media input fromand, optionally, sends information to, any or all of the followingsources: cable broadcast 230, satellite broadcast 232 (e.g., via asatellite dish), very high frequency (VHF) or ultra high frequency (UHF)radio frequency communication of the broadcast television networks 234(e.g., via an aerial antenna), telephone network 236 and cable modem 238(or another source of Internet content). Those skilled in the art willappreciate that the media components and media sources illustrated anddescribed with respect to FIG. 2 are purely exemplary and that mediasystem 200 may include more or fewer of both. For example, other typesof inputs to the system include AM/FM radio and satellite radio.

More details regarding this exemplary entertainment system andframeworks associated therewith can be found in the above-incorporatedby reference U.S. Patent Application “A Control Framework with aZoomable Graphical User Interface for Organizing, Selecting andLaunching Media Items”. Alternatively, remote devices in accordance withthe present invention can be used in conjunction with other systems, forexample computer systems including, e.g., a display, a processor and amemory system or with various other systems and applications.

As mentioned in the Background section, remote devices which operate as3D pointers are of particular interest for the present specification.Such devices enable the translation of movement, e.g., gestures, intocommands to a user interface. An exemplary 3D pointing device 400 isdepicted in FIG. 3. Therein, user movement of the 3D pointing can bedefined, for example, in terms of a combination of x-axis attitude(roll), y-axis elevation (pitch) and/or z-axis heading (yaw) motion ofthe 3D pointing device 400. In addition, some exemplary embodiments ofthe present invention can also measure linear movement of the 3Dpointing device 400 along the x, y, and z axes to generate cursormovement or other user interface commands. In the exemplary embodimentof FIG. 3, the 3D pointing device 400 includes two buttons 402 and 404as well as a scroll wheel 406, although other exemplary embodiments willinclude other physical configurations. According to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention, it is anticipated that 3D pointingdevices 400 will be held by a user in front of a display 408 and thatmotion of the 3D pointing device 400 will be translated by the 3Dpointing device into output which is usable to interact with theinformation displayed on display 408, e.g., to move the cursor 410 onthe display 408. For example, rotation of the 3D pointing device 400about the y-axis can be sensed by the 3D pointing device 400 andtranslated into an output usable by the system to move cursor 410 alongthe y₂ axis of the display 408. Likewise, rotation of the 3D pointingdevice 408 about the z-axis can be sensed by the 3D pointing device 400and translated into an output usable by the system to move cursor 410along the x₂ axis of the display 408. It will be appreciated that theoutput of 3D pointing device 400 can be used to interact with thedisplay 408 in a number of ways other than (or in addition to) cursormovement, for example it can control cursor fading, volume or mediatransport (play, pause, fast-forward and rewind). Input commands mayinclude operations in addition to cursor movement, for example, a zoomin or zoom out on a particular region of a display. A cursor may or maynot be visible. Similarly, rotation of the 3D pointing device 400 sensedabout the x-axis of 3D pointing device 400 can be used in addition to,or as an alternative to, y-axis and/or z-axis rotation to provide inputto a user interface.

According to one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, tworotational sensors 502 and 504 and one accelerometer 506 can be employedas sensors in 3D pointing device 400 as shown in FIG. 4. The rotationalsensors 502 and 504 can, for example, be implemented using ADXRS150 orADXRS401 sensors made by Analog Devices. It will be appreciated by thoseskilled in the art that other types of rotational sensors can beemployed as rotational sensors 502 and 504 and that the ADXRS150 andADXRS401 are purely used as an illustrative example. Unlike traditionalgyroscopes, these rotational sensors use MEMS technology to provide aresonating mass which is attached to a frame so that it can resonateonly along one direction. The resonating mass is displaced when the bodyto which the sensor is affixed is rotated around the sensor's sensingaxis. This displacement can be measured using the Coriolis accelerationeffect to determine an angular velocity associated with rotation alongthe sensing axis. If the rotational sensors 502 and 504 have a singlesensing axis (as for example the ADXRS150s), then they can be mounted inthe 3D pointing device 400 such that their sensing axes are aligned withthe rotations to be measured. For this exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention, this means that rotational sensor 504 is mounted suchthat its sensing axis is parallel to the y-axis and that rotationalsensor 502 is mounted such that its sensing axis is parallel to thez-axis as shown in FIG. 4. Note, however, that aligning the sensing axesof the rotational sensors 502 and 504 parallel to the desiredmeasurement axes is not required since exemplary embodiments of thepresent invention also provide techniques for compensating for offsetbetween axes.

One challenge faced in implementing exemplary 3D pointing devices 400 inaccordance with the present invention is to employ components, e.g.,rotational sensors 502 and 504, which are not too costly, while at thesame time providing a high degree of correlation between movement of the3D pointing device 400, a user's expectation regarding how the userinterface will react to that particular movement of the 3D pointingdevice and actual user interface performance in response to thatmovement. For example, if the 3D pointing device 400 is not moving, theuser will likely expect that the cursor ought not to be drifting acrossthe screen. Likewise, if the user rotates the 3D pointing device 400purely around the y-axis, she or he would likely not expect to see theresulting cursor movement on display 408 contain any significant x₂ axiscomponent. To achieve these, and other, aspects of exemplary embodimentsof the present invention, various measurements and calculations areperformed by the handheld device 400 which are used to adjust theoutputs of one or more of the sensors 502, 504 and 506 and/or as part ofthe input used by a processor to determine an appropriate output for theuser interface based on the outputs of the sensors 502, 504 and 506.These measurements and calculations are used to compensate for factorswhich fall broadly into two categories: (1) factors which are intrinsicto the 3D pointing device 400, e.g., errors associated with theparticular sensors 502, 504 and 506 used in the device 400 or the way inwhich the sensors are mounted in the device 400 and (2) factors whichare not intrinsic to the 3D pointing device 400, but are insteadassociated with the manner in which a user is using the 3D pointingdevice 400, e.g., linear acceleration, tilt and tremor. Exemplarytechniques for handling each of these effects are described below.

A process model 600 which describes the general operation of 3D pointingdevices according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention isillustrated in FIG. 5. The rotational sensors 502 and 504, as well asthe accelerometer 506, produce analog signals which are sampledperiodically, e.g., 200 samples/second. For the purposes of thisdiscussion, a set of these inputs shall be referred to using thenotation (x, y, z, ay, az), wherein x, y, z are the sampled outputvalues of the exemplary three-axis accelerometer 506 which areassociated with acceleration of the 3D pointing device in the x-axis,y-axis and z-axis directions, respectively, ay is a the sampled outputvalue from rotational sensor 502 associated with the rotation of the 3Dpointing device about the y-axis and az is the sampled output value fromrotational sensor 504 associated with rotation of the 3D pointing device400 about the z-axis.

The output from the accelerometer 506 is provided and, if theaccelerometer 506 provides analog output, then the output is sampled anddigitized by an ND converter (not shown) to generate sampledaccelerometer output 602. The sampled output values are converted fromraw units to units of acceleration, e.g., gravities (g), as indicated byconversion function 604. The acceleration calibration block 606 providesthe values used for the conversion function 604. This calibration of theaccelerometer output 602 can include, for example, compensation for oneor more of scale, offset and axis misalignment error associated with theaccelerometer 506. Exemplary conversions for the accelerometer data canbe performed using the following equation:

A=S*((M−P)·*G(T))  (1)

wherein M is a 3×1 column vector composed of the sampled output values(x, y, z), P is a 3×1 column vector of sensor offsets, and S is a 3×3matrix that contains both scale, axis misalignment, and sensor rotationcompensation. G(T) is a gain factor that is a function of temperature.The “*” operator represents matrix multiplication and the “·*” operatorrepresents element multiplication. The exemplary accelerometer 506 hasan exemplary full range of +/−2 g. Sensor offset, P, refers to thesensor output, M, for an accelerometer measurement of 0 g. Scale refersto the conversion factor between the sampled unit value and g. Theactual scale of any given accelerometer sensor may deviate from thesenominal scale values due to, e.g., manufacturing variances. Accordinglythe scale factor in the equations above will be proportional to thisdeviation.

Accelerometer 506 scale and offset deviations can be measured by, forexample, applying 1 g of force along one an axis and measuring theresult, R1. Then a −1 g force is applied resulting in measurement R2.The individual axis scale, s, and the individual axis offset, p, can becomputed as follows:

s=(R1−R2)/2  (2)

p=(R1+R2)/2  (3)

In this simple case, P is the column vector of the p for each axis, andS is the diagonal matrix of the 1/s for each axis.

However, in addition to scale and offset, readings generated byaccelerometer 506 may also suffer from cross-axes effects. Cross-axeseffects include non-aligned axes, e.g., wherein one or more of thesensing axes of the accelerometer 506 as it is mounted in the 3Dpointing device 400 are not aligned with the corresponding axis in theinertial frame of reference, or mechanical errors associated with themachining of the accelerometer 506 itself, e.g., wherein even though theaxes are properly aligned, a purely y-axis acceleration force may resultin a sensor reading along the z-axis of the accelerometer 506. Both ofthese effects can also be measured and added to the calibrationperformed by function 606.

The accelerometer 506 serves several purposes in exemplary 3D pointingdevices according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention. Forexample, if rotational sensors 502 and 504 are implemented using theexemplary Coriolis effect rotational sensors described above, then theoutput of the rotational sensors 502 and 504 will vary based on thelinear acceleration experienced by each rotational sensor. Thus, oneexemplary use of the accelerometer 506 is to compensate for fluctuationsin the readings generated by the rotational sensors 502 and 504 whichare caused by variances in linear acceleration. This can be accomplishedby multiplying the converted accelerometer readings by a gain matrix 610and subtracting (or adding) the results from (or to) the correspondingsampled rotational sensor data 612. For example, the sampled rotationaldata ay from rotational sensor 502 can be compensated for linearacceleration at block 614 as:

αy′=αy−C*A  (4)

wherein C is the 1×3 row vector of rotational sensor susceptibility tolinear acceleration along each axis given in units/g and A is thecalibrated linear acceleration. Similarly, linear accelerationcompensation for the sampled rotational data az from rotational sensor504 can be provided at block 614. The gain matrices, C, vary betweenrotational sensors due to manufacturing differences. C may be computedusing the average value for many rotational sensors, or it may be customcomputed for each rotational sensor.

Like the accelerometer data, the sampled rotational data 612 is thenconverted from a sampled unit value into a value associated with a rateof angular rotation, e.g., radians/s, at function 616. This conversionstep can also include calibration provided by function 618 to compensatethe sampled rotational data for, e.g., scale and offset.Conversion/calibration for both ay and az can be accomplished using, forexample, the following equation:

αrad/s=(α′−offset(T))*scale+dOffset  (5)

wherein α′ refers to the value being converted/calibrated, offset(T)refers to an offset value associated with temperature, scale refers tothe conversion factor between the sampled unit value and rad/s, anddOffset refers to a dynamic offset value. Equation (5) may beimplemented as a matrix equation in which case all variables are vectorsexcept for scale. In matrix equation form, scale corrects for axismisalignment and rotational offset factors. Each of these variables isdiscussed in more detail below.

The offset values offset(T) and dOffset can be determined in a number ofdifferent ways. When the 3D pointing device 400 is not being rotated in,for example, the y-axis direction, the sensor 502 should output itsoffset value. However, the offset can be highly affected by temperature,so this offset value will likely vary. Offset temperature calibrationmay be performed at the factory, in which case the value(s) foroffset(T) can be preprogrammed into the handheld device 400 or,alternatively, offset temperature calibration may also be learneddynamically during the lifetime of the device. To accomplish dynamicoffset compensation, an input from a temperature sensor 619 is used inrotation calibration function 618 to compute the current value foroffset(T). The offset(T) parameter removes the majority of offset biasfrom the sensor readings. However, negating nearly all cursor drift atzero movement can be useful for producing a high-performance pointingdevice. Therefore, the additional factor dOffset, can be computeddynamically while the 3D pointing device 400 is in use. The stationarydetection function 608 determines when the handheld is most likelystationary and when the offset should be recomputed. Exemplarytechniques for implementing stationary detection function 608, as wellas other uses therefore, are described below.

An exemplary implementation of dOffset computation employs calibratedsensor outputs which are low-pass filtered. The stationary outputdetection function 608 provides an indication to rotation calibrationfunction 618 to trigger computation of, for example, the mean of thelow-pass filter output. The stationary output detection function 608 canalso control when the newly computed mean is factored into the existingvalue for dOffset. Those skilled in the art will recognize that amultitude of different techniques can be used for computing the newvalue for dOffset from the existing value of dOffset and the new meanincluding, but not limited to, simple averaging, low-pass filtering andKalman filtering. Additionally, those skilled in the art will recognizethat numerous variations for offset compensation of the rotationalsensors 502 and 504 can be employed. For example, the offset(T) functioncan have a constant value (e.g., invariant with temperature), more thantwo offset compensation values can be used and/or only a single offsetvalue can be computed/used for offset compensation.

After conversion/calibration at block 616, the inputs from therotational sensors 502 and 504 can be further processed to rotate thoseinputs into an inertial frame of reference, i.e., to compensate for tiltassociated with the manner in which the user is holding the 3D pointingdevice 400, at function 620. Tilt correction is another significantaspect of some exemplary embodiments of the present invention as it isintended to compensate for differences in usage patterns of 3D pointingdevices according to the present invention. More specifically, tiltcorrection according to exemplary embodiments of the present inventionis intended to compensate for the fact that users will hold pointingdevices in their hands at different x-axis rotational positions, butthat the sensing axes of the rotational sensors 502 and 504 in the 3Dpointing devices 400 are fixed. It is desirable that cursor translationacross display 408 is substantially insensitive to the way in which theuser grips the 3D pointing device 400, e.g., rotating the 3D pointingdevice 400 back and forth in a manner generally corresponding to thehorizontal dimension (x₂-axis) of the display 508 should result incursor translation along the x₂-axis, while rotating the 3D pointingdevice up and down in a manner generally corresponding to the verticaldimension (y₂-axis) of the display 508 should result in cursortranslation along the y₂-axis, regardless of the orientation in whichthe user is holding the 3D pointing device 400.

To better understand the need for tilt compensation according toexemplary embodiments of the present invention, consider the exampleshown in FIG. 6(a). Therein, the user is holding 3D pointing device 400in an exemplary inertial frame of reference, which can be defined ashaving an x-axis rotational value of 0 degrees. The inertial frame ofreference can, purely as an example, correspond to the orientationillustrated in FIG. 6(a) or it can be defined as any other orientation.Rotation of the 3D pointing device 400 in either the y-axis or z-axisdirections will be sensed by rotational sensors 502 and 504,respectively. For example, rotation of the 3D pointing device 400 aroundthe z-axis by an amount Δz as shown in FIG. 6(b) will result in acorresponding cursor translation Δx₂ in the x₂ axis dimension across thedisplay 408 (i.e., the distance between the dotted version of cursor 410and the undotted version).

If, on the other hand, the user holds the 3D pointing device 400 in adifferent orientation, e.g., with some amount of x-axis rotationrelative to the inertial frame of reference, then the informationprovided by the sensors 502 and 504 would not (absent tilt compensation)provide an accurate representation of the user's intended interfaceactions. For example, referring to FIG. 6(c), consider a situationwherein the user holds the 3D pointing device 400 with an x-axisrotation of 45 degrees relative to the exemplary inertial frame ofreference as illustrated in FIG. 6(a). Assuming the same z-axis rotationΔz by a user, the cursor 410 will instead be translated in both thex₂-axis direction and the y₂-axis direction by as shown in FIG. 6(d).This is due to the fact that the sensing axis of rotational sensor 502is now oriented between the y-axis and the z-axis (because of theorientation of the device in the user's hand). Similarly, the sensingaxis of the rotational sensor 504 is also oriented between the y-axisand the z-axis (although in a different quadrant). In order to providean interface which is transparent to the user in terms of how the 3Dpointing device 400 is held, tilt compensation according to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention translates the readings output fromrotational sensors 502 and 504 back into the inertial frame of referenceas part of processing the readings from these sensors into informationindicative of rotational motion of the 3D pointing device 400.

According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, returningto FIG. 5, this can be accomplished by determining the tilt of the 3Dpointing device 400 using the inputs y and z received from accelerometer506 at function 622. More specifically, after the acceleration data isconverted and calibrated as described above, it can be low pass filteredat LPF 624 to provide an average acceleration (gravity) value to thetilt determination function 622. Then, tilt θ can be calculated infunction 622 as:

$\begin{matrix}{\theta = {\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{y}{z} \right)}} & (7)\end{matrix}$

The value θ can be numerically computed as a tan 2(y,z) to preventdivision by zero and give the correct sign. Then, function 620 canperform the rotation R of the converted/calibrated inputs αy and αzusing the equation:

$\begin{matrix}{R = {\begin{bmatrix}{\cos \; \theta} & {\sin \; \theta} \\{{- \sin}\; \theta} & {\cos \; \theta}\end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{bmatrix}{\alpha \; y} \\{\alpha \; z}\end{bmatrix}}} & (8)\end{matrix}$

to rotate the converted/calibrated inputs αy and αz to compensate forthe tilt θ. Tilt compensation as described in this exemplary embodimentis a subset of a more general technique for translating sensor readingsfrom the body frame of reference into a user's frame of reference, whichtechniques are further described in the above-incorporated by referencepatent application entitled “3D Pointing Devices with Tilt Compensationand Improved Usability”.

Once the calibrated sensor readings have been compensated for linearacceleration, processed into readings indicative of angular rotation ofthe 3D pointing device 400, and compensated for tilt, post-processingcan be performed at blocks 626 and 628. Exemplary post-processing caninclude compensation for various factors such as human tremor. Althoughtremor may be removed using several different methods, one way to removetremor is by using hysteresis. The angular velocity produced by rotationfunction 620 is integrated to produce an angular position. Hysteresis ofa calibrated magnitude is then applied to the angular position. Thederivative is taken of the output of the hysteresis block to again yieldan angular velocity. The resulting output is then scaled at function 628(e.g., based on the sampling period) and used to generate a resultwithin the interface, e.g., movement of a cursor 410 on a display 408.

Having provided a process description of exemplary 3D pointing devicesaccording to the present invention, FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplaryhardware architecture. Therein, a processor 800 communicates with otherelements of the 3D pointing device including a scroll wheel 802, JTAG804, LEDs 806, switch matrix 808, IR photodetector 810, rotationalsensors 812, accelerometer 814 and transceiver 816. The scroll wheel 802is an optional input component which enables a user to provide input tothe interface by rotating the scroll wheel 802 clockwise orcounterclockwise. JTAG 804 provides the programming and debugginginterface to the processor. LEDs 806 provide visual feedback to a user,for example, when a button is pressed. Switch matrix 808 receivesinputs, e.g., indications that a button on the 3D pointing device 400has been depressed or released, that are then passed on to processor800. The optional IR photodetector 810 can be provided to enable theexemplary 3D pointing device to learn IR codes from other remotecontrols. Rotational sensors 812 provide readings to processor 800regarding, e.g., the y-axis and z-axis rotation of the 3D pointingdevice as described above. Accelerometer 814 provides readings toprocessor 800 regarding the linear acceleration of the 3D pointingdevice 400 which can be used as described above, e.g., to perform tiltcompensation and to compensate for errors which linear accelerationintroduces into the rotational readings generated by rotational sensors812. Transceiver 816 is used to communicate information to and from 3Dpointing device 400, e.g., to the system controller 228 or to aprocessor associated with a computer. The transceiver 816 can be awireless transceiver, e.g., operating in accordance with the Bluetoothstandards for short-range wireless communication or an infraredtransceiver. Alternatively, 3D pointing device 400 can communicate withsystems via a wireline connection.

In the exemplary embodiment of FIG. 4, the 3D pointing device 400includes two rotational sensors 502 and 504, as well as an accelerometer506. However, according to another exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention, a 3D pointing device can alternatively include just onerotational sensor, e.g., for measuring angular velocity in the z-axisdirection, and an accelerometer. For such an exemplary embodiment,similar functionality to that described above can be provided by usingthe accelerometer to determine the angular velocity along the axis whichis not sensed by the rotational sensor. For example, rotational velocityaround the y-axis can be computed using data generated by theaccelerometer and calculating:

$\begin{matrix}{\omega_{Y} = {\frac{\partial\theta_{Y}}{\partial t} = {\frac{\partial}{\partial t}{\tan^{- 1}\left( \frac{x}{z} \right)}}}} & (9)\end{matrix}$

In addition, the parasitic acceleration effects that are not measured bya rotational sensor should also be removed. These effects include actuallinear acceleration, acceleration measured due to rotational velocityand rotational acceleration, and acceleration due to human tremor.

Stationary detection function 608, mentioned briefly above, can operateto determine whether the 3D pointing device 400 is, for example, eitherstationary or active (moving). This categorization can be performed in anumber of different ways. One way, according to an exemplary embodimentof the present invention, is to compute the variance of the sampledinput data of all inputs (x, y, z, αy, αz) over a predetermined window,e.g., every quarter of a second. This variance is then compared with athreshold to classify the 3D pointing device as either stationary oractive.

Another stationary detection technique according to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention involves transforming the inputsinto the frequency domain by, e.g., performing a Fast Fourier Transform(FFT) on the input data. Then, the data can be analyzed using, e.g.,peak detection methods, to determine if the 3D pointing device 400 iseither stationary or active. Additionally, a third category can bedistinguished, specifically the case where a user is holding the 3Dpointing device 400 but is not moving it (also referred to herein as the“stable” state. This third category can be distinguished from stationary(not held) and active by detecting the small movement of the 3D pointingdevice 400 introduced by a user's hand tremor when the 3D pointingdevice 400 is being held by a user. Peak detection can also be used bystationary detection function 608 to make this determination. Peakswithin the range of human tremor frequencies, e.g., nominally 8-12 Hz,will typically exceed the noise floor of the device (experienced whenthe device is stationary and not held) by approximately 20 dB.

In the foregoing examples, the variances in the frequency domain weresensed within a particular frequency range, however the actual frequencyrange to be monitored and used to characterize the status of the 3Dpointing device 400 may vary. For example, the nominal tremor frequencyrange may shift based on e.g., the ergonomics and weight of the 3Dpointing device 400, e.g., from 8-12 Hz to 4-7 Hz.

According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention,stationary detection mechanism 608 can include a state machine. Anexemplary state machine is shown in FIG. 8. Therein, the ACTIVE stateis, in this example, the default state during which the 3D pointingdevice 400 is moving and being used to, e.g., provide inputs to a userinterface. The 3D pointing device 400 can enter the ACTIVE state onpower-up of the device as indicated by the reset input. If the 3Dpointing device 400 stops moving, it may then enter the INACTIVE state.The various state transitions illustrated in FIG. 8 can be triggered byany of a number of different criteria including, but not limited to,data output from one or both of the rotational sensors 502 and 504, dataoutput from the accelerometer 506, time domain data, frequency domaindata or any combination thereof. State transition conditions will begenerically referred to herein using the convention“Condition_(stateA→stateB)”. For example, the 3D pointing device 400will transition from the ACTIVE state to the INACTIVE state whencondition_(active→inactive) occurs. For the sole purpose ofillustration, consider that condition_(active→inactive) can, in anexemplary 3D pointing device 400, occur when mean and/or standarddeviation values from both the rotational sensor(s) and theaccelerometer fall below first predetermined threshold values for afirst predetermined time period. When in the ACTIVE state, data receivedfrom the motion sensors (e.g., rotational sensor(s) and/oraccelerometer) can be separated into first data associated withintentional movement introduced by a user and second data associatedwith unintentional movement introduced by a user (tremor) using one ormore processing techniques such as linear filtering, Kalman filtering,Kalman smoothing, state-space estimation, Expectation-Maximization, orother model-based techniques. The first data can then be furtherprocessed to generate an output associated with the intended movement ofthe handheld device (e.g., to support cursor movement) while the seconddata can be used as tremor input for, e.g., user identification, asdescribed in more detail below.

State transitions can be determined by a number of different conditionsbased upon the interpreted sensor outputs. Exemplary condition metricsinclude the variance of the interpreted signals over a time window, thethreshold between a reference value and the interpreted signal over atime window, the threshold between a reference value and the filteredinterpreted signal over a time window, and the threshold between areference value and the interpreted signal from a start time can be usedto determine state transitions. All, or any combination, of thesecondition metrics can be used to trigger state transitions.Alternatively, other metrics can also be used. According to oneexemplary embodiment of the present invention, a transition from theINACTIVE state to the ACTIVE state occurs either when (1) a mean valueof sensor output(s) over a time window is greater than predeterminedthreshold(s) or (2) a variance of values of sensor output(s) over a timewindow is greater than predetermined threshold(s) or (3) aninstantaneous delta between sensor values is greater than apredetermined threshold.

The INACTIVE state enables the stationary detection mechanism 608 todistinguish between brief pauses during which the 3D pointing device 400is still being used, e.g., on the order of a tenth of a second, and anactual transition to either a stable or stationary condition. Thisprotects against the functions which are performed during the STABLE andSTATIONARY states, described below, from inadvertently being performedwhen the 3D pointing device is being used. The 3D pointing device 400will transition back to the ACTIVE state whencondition_(inactive→active) occurs, e.g., if the 3D pointing device 400starts moving again such that the measured outputs from the rotationalsensor(s) and the accelerometer exceeds the first threshold before asecond predetermined time period in the INACTIVE state elapses.

The 3D pointing device 400 will transition to either the STABLE state orthe STATIONARY state after the second predetermined time period elapses.As mentioned earlier, the STABLE state reflects the characterization ofthe 3D pointing device 400 as being held by a person but beingsubstantially unmoving, while the STATIONARY state reflects acharacterization of the 3D pointing device as not being held by aperson. Thus, an exemplary state machine according to the presentinvention can provide for a transition to the STABLE state after thesecond predetermined time period has elapsed if minimal movementassociated with hand tremor is present or, otherwise, transition to theSTATIONARY state.

The STABLE and STATIONARY states define times during which the 3Dpointing device 400 can perform various functions. For example, sincethe STABLE state is intended to reflect times when the user is holdingthe 3D pointing device 400 but is not moving it, the device can recordthe movement of the 3D pointing device 400 when it is in the STABLEstate e.g., by storing outputs from the rotational sensor(s) and/or theaccelerometer while in this state. These stored measurements can be usedto determine a tremor pattern associated with a particular user or usersas described below. Likewise, when in the STATIONARY state, the 3Dpointing device 400 can take readings from the rotational sensors and/orthe accelerometer for use in compensating for offset as described above.

If the 3D pointing device 400 starts to move while in either the STABLEor STATIONARY state, this can trigger a return to the ACTIVE state.Otherwise, after measurements are taken, the device can transition tothe SLEEP state. While in the sleep state, the device can enter a powerdown mode wherein power consumption of the 3D pointing device is reducedand, e.g., the sampling rate of the rotational sensors and/or theaccelerometer is also reduced. The SLEEP state can also be entered viaan external command so that the user or another device can command the3D pointing device 400 to enter the SLEEP state.

Upon receipt of another command, or if the 3D pointing device 400 beginsto move, the device can transition from the SLEEP state to the WAKEUPstate. Like the INACTIVE state, the WAKEUP state provides an opportunityfor the device to confirm that a transition to the ACTIVE state isjustified, e.g., that the 3D pointing device 400 was not inadvertentlyjostled.

The conditions for state transitions may be symmetrical or may differ.Thus, the threshold associated with the condition_(active→inactive) maybe the same as (or different from) the threshold(s) associated with theconditionin_(active→active). This enables 3D pointing devices accordingto the present invention to more accurately capture user input. Forexample, exemplary embodiments which include a state machineimplementation allow, among other things, for the threshold fortransition into a stationary condition to be different than thethreshold for the transition out of a stationary condition.

Entering or leaving a state can be used to trigger other devicefunctions as well. For example, the user interface can be powered upbased a transition from any state to the ACTIVE state. Conversely, the3D pointing device and/or the user interface can be turned off (or entera sleep mode) when the 3D pointing device transitions from ACTIVE orSTABLE to STATIONARY or INACTIVE. Alternatively, the cursor 410 can bedisplayed or removed from the screen based on the transition from or tothe stationary state of the 3D pointing device 400.

Tremor

As mentioned above, the period of time during which the handheld deviceis in the STABLE state can, for example, be used to memorize tremor dataassociated with a particular user. Typically, each user will exhibit adifferent tremor pattern. According to exemplary embodiments of thepresent invention, this property of user tremor can be used to identifywhich user is currently holding the handheld device without requiringany other action on the part of the user (e.g., entering a password).For example, a user's tremor pattern can be memorized by the handheld orthe system (e.g., either stored in the 3D pointing device 400 ortransmitted to the system) during an initialization procedure whereinthe user is requested to hold the 3D pointing device as steadily aspossible for, e.g., 10 seconds.

This pattern can be used as the user's unique (or quasi-unique)signature to perform a variety of user interface functions. For example,the user interface and/or the handheld device can identify the user froma group of users, e.g., a family, by comparing a current tremor patternwith those stored in memory. The identification can then be used, forexample, to retrieve preference settings associated with the identifieduser. For example, if the 3D pointing device is used in conjunction withthe media systems described in the above-incorporated by referencepatent application, then the media selection item display preferencesassociated with that user can be activated after the system recognizesthe user via tremor pattern comparison. System security can also beimplemented using tremor recognition, e.g., access to the system may beforbidden or restricted based on the user identification performed aftera user picks up the 3D pointing device 400.

A number of different approaches can be taken to implement schemes fortremor pattern detection, classification and storage according to thepresent invention. One exemplary embodiment will now be described withrespect to FIGS. 9-12. An overall method for classifying tremor patternsis depicted in the flowchart of FIG. 9. Therein, data sets are collectedfrom a plurality of users at step 900. Data set collection can be partof a training/initialization process, wherein a user is asked to holdthe device without introducing intentional motion for a predeterminedperiod of time (e.g., 5-15 seconds) or can be performed “on-the-fly”during use of the handheld device. Moreover, data collection can beperformed while holding the handheld device in a predeterminedorientation. Some purely exemplary frequency spectra data, shown inFIGS. 10(a)-10(d), was collected for a particular user holding a 3Dpointing device 400 in four different orientations.

Returning to FIG. 9, the collected data can then be processed in orderto identify classes which are each associated with different users ofthe handheld device 400. For example, one or more feature sets can beextracted from each set of collected data for use in the classificationprocess at step 902. The particular feature set or feature sets whichare selected for use in step 902 is chosen to provide good classdistinction for tremor data and may vary depending upon implementationparameters associated with the user identification via tremor processincluding, for example, the number of users to be distinguished in theclassification pool, the amount and type of training data to becollected at step 900, device characteristics, state information asdescribed above e.g., with respect to FIG. 8 and associated Bayesianuser information (e.g. time-of-day). An exemplary list of feature setswhich can be employed at step 902 are provided below as Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 Time- AR coefficients (e.g. RPLR or iterative Domain INVFREQZmethod) Normalized autocorrelation lags, AR coefficients (e.g. RPLR),Keenan, Tsay, or Subba Rao tests, features of the pure distribution ofthe time series, time reversal invariance, asymmetric decay of theautocorrelation function Frequency- PSD of rotational sensors-featuresDomain (e.g. peak frequencies, moments), PSD coefficients PSD ofaccelerometers-features (e.g. peak frequencies, moments), PSDcoefficients Cross-spectral analysis of rotational sensor data withaccelerometer data Higher- HOS (Bispectrum, trispectrum)-exploit Ordernon-gaussianity of tremor Statistics Hinich statistical tests Volterraseries modeling Time- Parameters extracted from STFT, FrequencyWigner-Ville and/or (Choi-Williams) Domain TF distributions. Time-ScaleDWT-Discrete Wavelet Transform Domain MODWT-Maximum Overlap Transform(cyclic-invariant) CWT-Complex Wavelet Transform (shift-invariant) OtherPeriodicity Transforms Transforms (e.g. small-to-large, m-best, etc.)Cyclic Spectra Other Chaotic measures (e.g. Lyapunov Measures exponents,fractal dimension, correlation dimension)

Information regarding some of these feature sets and corresponding testscan be found in the article by J. Jakubowski, K. Kwiatos, A. Chwaleba,S. Osowski, “Higher Order Statistics and Neural Network For TremorRecognition,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 49, no.2, pp. 152-159, IEEE, February 2002, the disclosure of which isincorporated here by reference. According to one purely exemplaryembodiment of the present invention, described in more detail below, lowfrequency spectra from a power spectral density (PSD) of the collecteddata was used as the feature set at step 902. In addition to thedomains, transforms etc., listed above, the features sets may also varybased on the number and types of sensors available in the handhelddevice for which tremor detection/identification is to be employed. Forexample, in the handheld, 3D pointing device 400 described in earlierexemplary embodiments, tremor data can be collected from one or both ofthe rotational sensors, the accelerometer, or any combination thereof.

After extracting the feature set from the collected data, the featureset can be reduced at step 904. More specifically, the feature set canbe reduced at step 904 to the set of features which best represent thefeature set for purposes of differentiating between classes (users). Forexample, the DC values of user tremor data may be omitted from thereduced feature set, whereas the 9 Hz values of user tremor data may beincluded in the reduced feature set, since the latter would be expectedto be more useful in distinguishing between different user's handtremors. The reduced feature set can, for example, be a Most ExpressiveFeature (MEF) set which is determined using a Principal ComponentAnalysis (PCA) algorithm. The PCA algorithm employs a singular valuedecomposition of the features set to automatically find an appropriateset of basis vectors that best expresses the feature vectors (e.g., inthe sense of minimum mean-squared error (MMSE)). An example for applyingthe PCA technique can be found in “Eigenspace-Based Recognition ofFaces: Comparisons and a New Approach,” authored by P. Navarrete and J.Ruiz-del Solar, Image Analysis and Processing, 2001, the disclosure ofwhich is incorporated here by reference.

The reduced feature sets can then be used to identify clusters at step908, which can be performed using supervised learning i.e., wherein theprocess operates based on a priori knowledge of which individual usercontributed which data set or unsupervised learning, i.e., wherein theprocess does not have any a priori information. Various techniques canbe applied to determine clusters associated with tremor data accordingto exemplary embodiments of the present invention, including, forexample, K-means clustering and RBF neural net classification. Once theclusters are identified, then estimated statistics associated with theidentified clusters (e.g., mean and/or covariance) can be used todistinguish new feature vectors as lying within certain clusters oroutside of certain clusters, i.e., to identify a user who is currentlyholding the handheld device 400 based on current sensor outputs, at step910. The learning method can be enhanced via use of the sensor stateinformation (described above, e.g., with respect to FIG. 8) by refiningclusters centers during sensor operation, after initial user/clusterinstantiation. In this way, the maximum amount of available data is usedto refine clusters (in a supervised manner), to support furtherunsupervised learning.

To test the afore-described exemplary techniques for identifying usersbased on detected hand tremor, data sets associated with four otherusers (in addition to the data illustrated in FIGS. 10(a)-10(d)) werecollected and analyzed in the general manner described above withrespect to the flowchart of FIG. 9 to demonstrate that hand tremoranalysis can be used to distinguish between/identify different users.Two of the data sets were collected from the same person holding thehandheld device, while the other three data sets were collected fromdifferent people holding the handheld device. In this test, data wascollected from both of the rotational sensors 812 for each of the fivedata sets at step 900. Each of the data sets was processed to havezero-mean and unit variance. For this exemplary test, low-frequencyspectra from a PSD estimate (e.g., peak frequencies) were used for thefeature set extraction, averaged over the data collection time, at step902. More specifically, 256 point FFTs were used averaged with a 75%overlap over N=2048 points within a frequency range of 0-30 Hz. Theextracted feature set was reduced from a 38×20 matrix to a 20×20 matrixusing the PCA algorithm, which correctly recognized that certaineigenvectors associated with the extracted feature set are lessexpressive than others and can be discarded. FIG. 11 illustrateseigenvalues generated as part of step 904 in this example. Therein, line1100 depicts eigenvalues associated with feature set 2 (data collectedfrom rotational sensor 504, z-azis rotation) and line 1102 depictseigenvalues associated with feature set 1 (data collected fromrotational sensor 502, y-axis rotation).

In this test case, the clustering step was performed based on the apriori knowledge (supervised learning) of which user generated whichdata set. In an actual implementation, it is likely that an automatedclustering technique, e.g., one of those described above, would beemployed at step 906. For this purely exemplary test, clusters wereidentified separately for data received from the rotational sensor 502and 504 to define two class centroids associated with each data set.Then, the sum of the distances (Euclidean in this example) between eachvector in the data sets and the two class centroids was calculated. Theresults of this process are shown in FIG. 12. Therein, the x-axisrepresents the reduced data set vectors, the y-axis represents distanceand the vertical lines partition distances to different class (user)centroids. It can be seen that within each partition the associatedclass' vector-to-centroid distance is significantly lower than the otherclasses' vector-to-centroid distance, illustrating good class separationand an ability to distinguish/identify users based on the hand tremorthat they induce in a handheld device.

Some specific selections of, e.g., feature sets, etc. were made toperform the illustrated test, however these selections are purelyillustrative as mentioned herein.

A number of variations can be employed according to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention. For example, once the clusters areidentified at step 908, a cluster discrimination step can be performedin order to accentuate the discriminating feature(s) of each cluster. Acluster discriminant operates to apply a transformation matrix to thedata which provides a minimum grouping within sets, and a maximumdistance between sets. Given a matrix which describes the overallcovariance, and another which describes the sum of the covariances ofeach of the clusters, the linear discriminant's task is to derive alinear transformation which simultaneously maximizes the distancesbetween classes and minimizes the within-class scatter. Although anumber of discriminants are known in the general field of patternrecognition, for example the Fisher Linear Discriminant (FLD), not allare likely to be suitable to the specific problem of identifying usersbased on hand tremor as described herein. One specific discriminantwhich was used in the foregoing text example, is known as the EFM-1discriminant and is described in the article entitled “Enhanced FisherLinear Discriminant Models for Face Recognition”, authored by C. Liu andH. Wechsler, Proc. 14^(th) International Conference on PatternRecognition, Queensland Australia, Aug. 17-20, 1998, the disclosure ofwhich is incorporated here by reference.

Moreover, although the foregoing test was performed using a handheldpointing device in accordance with earlier described exemplaryembodiments of the present invention, tremor-based identification ofusers is not so limited. In fact, tremor-based identification can beemployed in any other type of 3D pointing device having any type ofmotion sensor or sensors (including gyroscopes) from which tremor datacan be generated. Further, tremor-based identification in accordancewith the present invention is also not limited to pointing devices, butcan be employed in any handheld device, e.g., cell phones, PDAs, etc.,which incorporate one or more motion sensors or which have some othermechanism for measuring hand tremor associated therewith. A trainingperiod may be employed to perform, e.g., steps 900-908, subsequent towhich a handheld device can perform a method which simply gathers dataassociated with the hand tremor of a current user and compares that datawith the previously established user classes to identify the currentuser. This identity information can then be used in a number ofdifferent applications, examples of which are mentioned above.

For example, the identity of the user (as recognized by tremor-basedrecognition or via another identification technique) can be used tointerpret gestures made by that user to signal commands to a userinterface, e.g., that of the above-incorporated by reference patentapplication. For example, in a gesture based command system whereinpatterns of movement over time are associated with specific interfacecommands, different users may employ somewhat different patterns ofmovement over time of the handheld to initiate the same interfacecommand (much like different people have different handwriting styles).The ability to provide for user identification can then be mapped to thedifferent gesture patterns, e.g., stored in the handheld or in thesystem, such that the system as a whole correctly identifies eachpattern of movement over time as the command gesture intended by theuser.

Frame of Reference Mapping

As mentioned above, exemplary embodiments of the present inventionprocess movement data received from sensor(s) in the 3D pointing deviceto convert this data from the frame of reference of the 3D pointingdevice's body into another frame of reference, e.g., the user's frame ofreference. In the exemplary application of a 3D pointing device used tocontrol a user interface displayed on a screen, e.g., a television, theuser's frame of reference might be a coordinate system associated withthe television screen. Regardless, translation of the data from the bodyframe of reference into another frame of reference improves theusability of the handheld device by resulting in an operation that isfrom the user's perspective rather than the device's perspective. Thus,when the user moves his or her hand from left to right in front of adisplay while holding the 3D pointing device, the cursor will move inthe left to right direction regardless of the orientation of the 3Dpointing device.

To simplify this discussion an exemplary processing system associatedwith a 3D pointing device is shown in FIG. 13, e.g., as described inmore detail above. Therein, the handheld system senses motion using oneor more sensors 1301, e.g., rotational sensor(s), gyroscopes(s),accelerometer(s), magnetometer(s), optical sensor(s), camera(s) or anycombination thereof. The sensors are then interpreted in block 1302 toproduce an estimate of the motion that occurred. The processing block1303 then translates the measured motion from the natural (body)reference frame of the device into the reference frame of the user. Themovement is then mapped 1304 into meaningful actions that areinterpreted at block 1305 forwarded to the system to produce ameaningful response, such as moving an on-screen cursor.

Block 1303 converts detected movement into the reference frame of theuser instead of the reference frame of the device. Orientation may berepresented by many different mathematically similar methods includingEuler angles, a direction cosine matrix (DCM), or a unit quaternion.Position is generally represented as an offset from the coordinatesystem origin in a consistent unit including but not limited to meters,centimeters, feet, inches, and miles. In one exemplary embodimentdescribed above, a 3D pointing device measures inertial forces includingacceleration and rotational velocity. These forces are measured relativeto the body of the device by sensors mounted therein. In order toconvert the measured data into the user frame of reference, the deviceestimates both its position and its orientation.

In this exemplary embodiment, it is assumed that the user frame ofreference is stationary and has fixed orientation, although thoseskilled in the art will appreciate that this technique in accordancewith the present invention can be readily extended to the cases wherethe user's frame of reference is non-stationary by either directlytransforming to the time-varying frame or by first converting to astationary frame and then converting to the moving frame. For thestationary, fixed-orientation user frame of reference example,conversion from the body frame to the user frame can be performed by useof the following equations:

Pu=Rotate(Pb,Q)+Pdelta

Pu′=Rotate(Pb′,Q)

Pu″=Rotate(Pb″,Q)

Wu=Rotate(Wb,Q)

Wu′=Rotate(Wb′,Q)

where:

Rotate represents the quaternion rotation operator such that Rotate(A,Q) is equal to Q*A Q where Q*is the quaternion conjugate and the vectorA is a quaternion with the complex component equal to A and the realcomponent equal to 0;

Pu is the position in the user frame of reference;

Pb is the position in the device frame of reference;

′ represents the derivative. Therefore, Pu′ is the derivative of theposition in the user frame of reference which is the velocity in theuser frame of reference;

Wu is the angular velocity of the device in body angles in the userframe of reference;

Wb is the angular velocity of the device in body angles in the bodyframe of the device;

Pdelta is the difference between the origin of the user frame ofreference and the body frame of reference in the user frame of referencecoordinate system;

Q is the normalized rotation quaternion that represents the rotationfrom the body frame to the user frame. Since the rotation quaternion torotate from the user frame to the body frame is Q*, we could replace Qwith R* where R is the rotation from the user frame to the body frame.Note that Q can be represented in a number of equivalent forms includingEuler angles and the direction cosine matrix (DCM), and the aboveequations may vary slightly in their equivalent forms based upondifferent representations of Q. FIG. 14 graphically illustrates thetransformation from a body frame of reference to a user's frame ofreference.

During operation, the device estimates Q in an implementation dependentmanner to perform this transformation. One exemplary implementationdescribed above involves compensating for tilt (i.e., variations inx-axis roll of the 3D pointing device based on the manner in which it isheld by a user). The orientation is computed by first estimating theacceleration component due to gravity in the body frame, Ab. Bydefinition, the acceleration vector due to gravity in the user frame,Ag, is set to [0, 0, −1]. Since gravity cannot estimate the heading(rotation about the z-axis), the body frame estimate for heading isused. Therefore, the rotation quaternion has an axis of rotation in thez=0 plane. The following is one of several mathematically equivalentmethods for computing the rotation quaternion:

V=∥Ab∥×∥Ag∥(cross product of unit vectors)

qV=∥V∥

α=sin⁻¹ |V|

Q=Quaternion[qV,α/2]=[qV*sin(α/2), cos(α/2)

Position is then computed as the double integral of the acceleration inthe user frame. The acceleration in the user frame is the accelerationof the body frame rotated into the user frame by Q above. Normally, theorigin is assumed to be zero when the device is first activated, but theorigin may be reset during normal operation either manually orautomatically.

Generally, when the device is not moving, Pu′, Pu″, Wu, and Wu″ are all0. In this exemplary embodiment, Pb″ and Wb are measured. Although aninfinite number of rotations Q exist, the minimal rotation can beselected from the available set and used to estimate Wu based on Wb.Alternatively, Q may be computed using an assumed starting offsetorientation Qo, by integrating Wb over time as shown using the discretetime integral below:

WbAngle=|Wb|*period

Q _(DELTA)=[∥Wb∥sin(WbAngle), cos(WbAngle)]

Q _(NEXT) =Q ₀ **Q _(DELTA)

Where * represents multiplication and ** represents quaternionmultiplication. Additional stability can be provided by constant fieldvectors including gravity and the earth's magnetic field and combinedwith the results above. The combination can be achieved using severalnumerical and filtering methods including, but not limited to, Kalmanfiltering.

A variety of different sensors could be employed as long as they measuremotion with respect to the body of the device. Exemplary sensors includeaccelerometers, rotational sensors, gyroscopes, magnetometers andcameras. The user frame does not need to be stationary. For example, ifthe user's frame of reference is selected to be the user's forearm, thenthe device would only respond to wrist and finger movement.

One skilled in the art will recognize the commutative property appliesto the frame of reference transformations described in this invention.Therefore, the order of the mathematical operations can be alteredwithout materially affecting the invention described herein. Inaddition, many motion processing algorithms can operate in either frameof reference equivalently, especially when the user frame is chosen tobe stationary with a constant orientation.

In addition to providing ease of use, frame of reference transformationsaccording to this exemplary embodiment of the present invention can alsobe used to address other challenges in handheld device implementations.For example, if a sensor (such as an accelerometer) is not locatedprecisely at the center of rotation in the body frame of reference, themeasured acceleration will include both the acceleration of the frameand acceleration components due to the rotation of the frame. Therefore,the measured acceleration can first be transformed to a different targetlocation within the body frame of the device using the followingrelationship:

Abody=Aaccelerometer+ω′×R+ω×(ω×R)

where R is the vector from the accelerometer to the target location, ωis the angular velocity of the body frame of reference and w′ is theangular acceleration of the body frame of reference. If the body frameof the device is constructed such that it lies at R from theaccelerometer, then it should have zero angular acceleration effects andmay be more easily used to compute the device movement in the userframe. This compensates for intentional or unintentional misalignmentbetween the accelerometer and the center of the body frame of reference.In addition, the estimate of the gravity vector becomes much simplersince there are fewer forces acting at the center of rotation. Then,

Auser=Rotate(Abody,Q)

where Q is the rotation from the body frame of reference to theaccelerometer frame of reference.

Unfortunately, different users have different values for R. For example,one user may use the handheld device by rotating their elbow whileanother may use the device by rotating their wrist. In addition, peoplehave different sized wrists and forearms. For improved usability thisexemplary embodiment of the handheld dynamically computes R and movesthe body origin such that it has minimal acceleration components due toangular motion. The exemplary embodiment estimates R by defining R as[Rx, 0, 0] and solving for Rx using and minimizing Abody−Rotate[Ag, Q].Note that many numerical methods exist including recursive least squaresand Kalman filtering that may perform minimization to compute Rx.

Based on the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the presentinvention describes various techniques for mapping sensed motion of ahandheld device from one frame of reference (e.g., a body frame ofreference) to another frame of reference (e.g., a user's frame ofreference). These mappings can be independent from other mappingsassociated with the use of the handheld device, e.g., the mapping ofsensed motion to cursor movement or can be combined therewith. Moreover,transformations according to the present invention can be performed totransform the sensed motion in all three dimensions, for translationalmotion and rotational motion or any subset thereof, from the perspectiveof either the input side of the motion equation or the output side.Additionally, the selection of the frame of reference into which thesensed motion is mapped or transformed can be made in a number ofdifferent ways. One example provided above shows the second frame ofreference being a user's frame of reference associated with the tilt ofthe device, however many other variations are possible. For example, theuser may select his or her desired frame of reference, which setting canbe stored in the handheld as one of a plurality of user preferences andused to perform the transformation. Other examples include userrecognition and explicit command (e.g., button or user interfaceselection) as techniques for selecting the second frame of reference.

Additionally, although some of the exemplary embodiments describe aboveoperate on data in the velocity domain, the present invention is not solimited. Mapping or transformation according to the present inventioncan alternatively or additionally be performed on, for example, positionor acceleration data and can be for translational motion, rotationalmotion or both. Also the order of processing is not critical. Forexample, if the handheld device is being used to output gesturecommands, the mapping can be performed first and then the gesturedetermined or the gesture can be determined first and then the mappingcan be performed.

Removal of Unintentional Movement

According to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, techniquesfor processing sensed motion remove undesirable effects due to, forexample, other user-device interactions, such as button actuation,and/or tremor. Generally, as referred to in FIG. 15, the input to thesystem is human movement of the handheld, 3D pointing device. Thismovement is sensed by the device (block 1510) and processed intorepresentative motion, e.g., at block 1512, detailed examples of whichare described above. It should be noted, however that these exemplaryembodiments of the present invention are not limited to application inthe exemplary handheld, 3D pointing device 400 described above and areexpressly intended to include other handheld devices, e.g., 3D pointingdevices using other types of motion sensors. The representative motionis then converted into a meaningful representation (block 1514) that isprocessed by exemplary “human factors” techniques according to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention at block 1516. In the exemplaryembodiment described herein, the output of human factors processing 1516is then mapped into, for example, 2D pointer movement. The processedmovement is then output by the handheld device, an example of which isdata that can be used to control on-screen pointer movement.

This exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes a variety ofdifferent techniques for processing movement during user initiatedevents including button clicks. According to a first exemplaryembodiment, both a distance threshold and a time threshold are employedto process movement information generated by the motion sensor(s), e.g.,rotational sensor(s), accelerometer(s), magnetometer(s), gyroscope(s),camera(s), or any combination thereof, etc., after a user action, e.g.,a button click, has occurred. Distance alone may not be sufficient toyield both a stable and a responsive pointer during a button click. Whena button press is detected by the hand held device, the output pointermovement from 1516 is suppressed until either the distance exceeds adistance threshold or the amount of elapsed time exceeds a timethreshold. Either or both of the distance and time thresholds may bedifferent for, e.g., a button press action and button release action.The exemplary button processing may optionally be disabled by sending acommand to the handheld.

Different buttons can also have different thresholds from one another.The amount of movement that the handheld experiences during a buttonclick depends upon a number of factors including, but not limited to,the user, the button actuation force, the button travel, and thelocation of the button relative to the handheld center of support(normally a user's hand). The button movement processing parameters maybe set individually to optimize the performance for each button. Inaddition, the parameters can be learned based upon the session historyor based upon the user if the user is known to the system.

Additionally, the human factors processing function 1516 may store andtrack the past movement history of the handheld device. For example,when the handheld device detects that a button has been pressed, aprocessing unit in the handheld device can back up to the time beforethe user initiated the button event. Physically actuating the buttontakes a non-finite, measurable amount of time that can be determined bypsychological testing and dynamic device measurement. When the button isactuated, the device can revert to the state before the button actuationoccurred by deleting data samples taken from the motion sensor(s)during/after the button actuation occurred. Therefore, the errantmovement that occurred during the button press will be ignored and“erased”. For example, in response to a detected button press, theoutput from block 1516 may change from a detected position P1(subsequent to a button press action) to a recalled position P2, whichposition P2 had previously been output by block 1516 a predeterminedtime period prior to the button press action detection. If the device isalready processing one button action and is still suppressing movementwhen another button action occurs, it may be unnecessary for the humanfactors processing function 1516 to reiterate the backing up process.

In user interfaces, at least two typical types of button activations canoccur. In the first type (fine mode clicking) shown in FIG. 16, the userintends precise actuation over a small target and carefully aligns thedevice, stops movement, and then presses the button. In the second type(coarse mode clicking), the target is large and the user anticipates thenext action, i.e., the user may only slow down the pointer withoutstopping or hovering over the target and may instead intend to click onthe target “on-the-fly”. For fine mode clicking, the above-describedprocessing technique operates to accurately remove unintentional motiondata from the combined data output stream from the motion sensor(s) inthe handheld device. However, for the second type of movement, furtherenhancements may be useful to improve performance.

To address the additional challenges posed by coarse mode clicking,human factors processing unit 1516 may employ a second alternative orcomplementary technique. According to this second exemplary embodiment,movement data received from the motion sensor(s) is processed into amovement vector and it is assumed that the user may intend some movementchange of the cursor or other associated output from the device duringthe button actuation. As known from Newton's first law, “an object inmotion tends to stay in motion”. Thus, when a button is pressed on thehandheld device, it creates a high-frequency movement that deviates fromthe path. Using the motion vector and filtered movement information, theoutput from the pointing device can continue during and after theuser-initiated event in a manner which is consistent with previousmovement history. This can be accomplished by adding a filter to theprocessing chain. The filter is designed to permit intended motionduring and after the user-initiated event while excluding the highfrequency movement associated with the event itself. Many processingmethods such as low-pass filtering enable the removal of high-frequencycomponents but at the expense of increased latency. Since latency (thetime between the movement of the device and the time the pointer moves)may be important to the user, exemplary embodiments of the presentinvention can use an adaptive filter which is switched into the signalprocessing path when a user-initiated event is detected (e.g., based onthe same signal which is used by the handheld device to convey theuser-event to a user interface). The adaptive filter is configured as alow-pass filter that attenuates sharp, high-frequency button presses. Anadditional input to the adaptive filtering block is an optionalpre-button activity warning that occurs before the button has beencompletely debounced. The pre-button activity warning reduces the filterlatency requirements by allowing the processing to be notified of abutton event sooner than it would otherwise. The adaptive filter withthe pre-button activity warning minimizes the engineering tradeoffbetween intended movement and latency.

According to yet another exemplary embodiment of the present invention,since the designers of 3D pointing devices usually know the direction ofthe undesirable movement at design time, the direction of movementperturbation is therefore known based upon the ergonomics and intendeduse of the device. For example, the designer knows the direction ofbutton actuation relative to the device. The primary movement consistsof either linear movement parallel to the button travel vector orrotational movement due to the torque about the users grip. Thisknowledge permits the implementation of a directional preference filterthat includes the knowledge of the button actuation movement. Forexample, the filter design can include state-space filters such as aKalman filter and adaptive filters. Such a filter detects the undesireddeviation from the intended path in a known direction during buttonactuation and then interpolates the desired movement path during buttonactuation. This preferential filtering yields a more responsive pointerduring intended changes in direction while still removing the unintendedbutton movement. One skilled in the art will recognize that thestate-space filter can be extended to learn the design parameters duringthe course of normal use.

The human factors processing function 916 according to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention may implement one or both of theabove-described techniques and, if both are used, provide a classifierto switch between the techniques. For example, when the first, precisetype of button click is detected, the first technique can be used. Whenthe second, less precise type of button click is detected, the secondtechnique can be used. One classifier for switching between techniquescan use the velocity of the handheld device at the time of buttonactuation or at the time just before button actuation. For example, if(a) the velocity of the handheld device is below a predeterminedvelocity threshold then the first technique is employed which discardsmotion data generated subsequent to a detected event until either motionsensed by the motion sensor(s) indicates that the handheld device hasmoved more than a predetermined distance threshold or a predeterminedtime has expired, otherwise, (b) if the velocity of the handheld deviceis above the predetermined velocity, then the second technique isemployed which instead filters the motion data generated subsequent to adetected event.

Button clicks or presses as referred to in the foregoing exemplaryembodiments include, but are not limited to, both button presses andbutton releases. All of the above techniques can be applied to any knowndevice interaction that yields undesirable movement, and are not limitedto button clicks. For example, the above techniques can be applied toscroll wheel actuation, touch pad usage, or capacitive strip usage.Thus, exemplary embodiments of the present invention describe methodsand devices for canceling unwanted movement that occurs based uponactivating or deactivating another event.

The parameters for the methods describe above can be adapted to supportthe expected movement characteristic for the event. In the exemplaryembodiment, the parameters for button presses can be different from theparameters for button releases. In addition to movement cancellation,the user interface may impose or suggest additional constraints onuser-event handling according to the present invention. For example, inMicrosoft Windows™ operating systems, if the cursor moves while thebutton is pressed, then a “drag” action is initiated. Therefore,parameters associated with motion data processing in response to abutton press action by a user can have values which tend to restrictpointer movement during button actuation in order to prevent unwanteddrag events. In contrast, cursor movement after a button release inMicrosoft Windows™ operating systems has little effect on objects in theuser interface and, therefore, exemplary motion data processing inaccordance with the present invention can employ parameters (e.g., timeand or distance thresholds, filter coefficients, etc.) which tend to beless restrictive of pointer movements as compared to the correspondingparameters associated with motion data processing subsequent to buttonpresses.

The movement may be processed in the velocity or position domain in anumber of different fashions to help remove unwanted button movement.Simple filtering in the velocity domain may be used. The filter may bean FIR or IIR filter, although these may introduce an undesirable amountof processing delay. An adaptive filter can be used successfully withoutintroducing too much delay.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention can also be implementedas a Kalman filter (or extended Kalman filter). The Kalman filter couldselect the most likely usage scenario (stationary or moving) and applythe appropriate movement. Neural networks can be used for the sameresult. Thus it will be appreciated that the present invention furtherprovides a method for (a) detecting that an event has occurred, (b)inferring the user's intended motion and (c) interpreting the user'sintended motion rather than the actual motion of the handheld device.The motion can be in either the 6DOF 3D domain or the mapped 2DOFpointing domain. The 6DOF 3D domain could be in either the device's bodyframe of reference or the user's frame of reference.

According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, themovement associated with the user-initiated event can be modeled andincluded explicitly in a motion equation which provides an output fromthe handheld device based on the motion data gathered from the motionsensor(s). More specifically, using the button press example of auser-initiated event, the movement caused by button presses can bemodeled a priori to determine one or more exemplary movement amplitudesand directions associated with the button press action and these valuescan then be stored in a memory unit of the handheld device. Then, when abutton press is detected, the processing unit of the handheld device canuse the modeled movement in the motion equation to adapt the output suchthat it reflects the user's intended motion rather than the movementdetected by the motion sensor(s) that was associated with the buttonpress. The processing unit can use the modeled values in a variety ofdifferent ways, e.g., subtract them from the detected motion values,attenuate the detected motion values based on the modeled valuesassociated with the particular user-initiated event, adjust a semanticmap associated with the handheld's output, etc.

Thus it can be seen that exemplary embodiments of the present inventiondescribe innovative methods of implementing a handheld remote controlfor various uses including controlling a television. The device can alsobe used for other applications, e.g., as an input device to a personalcomputer and object control.

No longer does the remote control have to resemble a miniature keyboardof buttons (the typical IR remote of today has 40 buttons). Rather,remote control devices in accordance with the present invention canclosely resemble a mouse in that the activity of pointing conveysinformation over and above the mere pressing of buttons. The result is amuch more powerful user environment for the remote control of devicesand applications. Imagine today's PC without a mouse and you havetoday's TV control environment. Now imagine adding mouse-likefunctionality to the TV; the result is a vastly improved userexperience. All it requires is a wireless handheld capable of allowingpointing as well as button activation. The present invention describesjust such a device. One advantage of this design over the traditionalremote control is that it allows the user to position a cursor on thescreen in addition to detecting button activation. The result is thatscreen-sensitive buttons and controls in addition to gesture recognitionare possible. The result is a very powerful, flexible and extensibleuser interface when compared with the traditional remote control whereadding a function requires a new button to be added. Exemplaryembodiments of the present invention provide these capabilities usinghandheld remote control devices that employ, e.g., MEMS-based rotationalsensors which measure angular velocity of the device. In addition,exemplary embodiments provide for teach body frame adjustment,calibration and post-processing to remove unintentional movement. Theresult is a totally unique implementation that is better performing,cheaper and smaller than conventional handheld remote control devices.

These exemplary techniques use MEMS sensors to measure rotationalangular velocity and linear acceleration. Then, calibration is used inconjunction with stationary detection to adjust and scale the rawreadings. The linear acceleration readings are then integrated and usedto determine orientation of the handheld body frame. This orientationdata is then used to map the rotational velocity readings into theappropriate frame of reference. The final step is that the readings ofall movement are post-processed so that unintentional movement likehuman tremor is filtered out.

Systems and methods for processing data according to exemplaryembodiments of the present invention can be performed by one or moreprocessors executing sequences of instructions contained in a memorydevice. Such instructions may be read into the memory device from othercomputer-readable mediums such as secondary data storage device(s).Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in the memorydevice causes the processor to operate, for example, as described above.In alternative embodiments, hard-wire circuitry may be used in place ofor in combination with software instructions to implement the presentinvention.

The above-described exemplary embodiments are intended to beillustrative in all respects, rather than restrictive, of the presentinvention. Thus the present invention is capable of many variations indetailed implementation that can be derived from the descriptioncontained herein by a person skilled in the art. For example, althoughthe foregoing exemplary embodiments describe, among other things, theuse of inertial sensors to detect movement of a device, other types ofsensors (e.g., ultrasound, magnetic or optical) can be used instead of,or in addition to, inertial sensors in conjunction with theafore-described signal processing. All such variations and modificationsare considered to be within the scope and spirit of the presentinvention as defined by the following claims. No element, act, orinstruction used in the description of the present application should beconstrued as critical or essential to the invention unless explicitlydescribed as such. Also, as used herein, the article “a” is intended toinclude one or more items.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for controlling a system comprising thesteps of: detecting movement associated with a device; determining ifsaid movement indicates that said device is currently being held by auser; and controlling said system based on a result of said determiningstep.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:identifying said user based upon a tremor pattern associated with saidmovement.
 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of:selectively turning said system on based upon said step of identifying.4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: turning saidsystem on if said device is currently being held by a user.
 5. Themethod of claim 2, further comprising the step of: restricting access tosaid system based upon an identity of said user.
 6. The method of claim5, wherein said system is a media system and said step of restrictingaccess further comprises the step of: selectively permitting said userto access a media item based upon said identity.
 7. The method of claim2, further comprising the step of: determining an identity of said userby comparing said tremor pattern with a plurality of stored tremorpatterns.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein said tremor pattern and saidplurality of stored tremor patterns are in the frequency domain.
 9. Themethod of claim 7, wherein said tremor pattern and said plurality ofstored tremor patterns are in the time domain.
 10. The method of claim7, wherein if a match does not occur between said tremor pattern andsaid plurality of stored tremor patterns, then said tremor pattern isstored.
 11. The method of claim 7, wherein if a match does not occurbetween said tremor pattern and said plurality of stored tremorpatterns, then said user is assigned a default set of system accesspermissions.
 12. The method of claim 2, further comprising the step of:retrieving preference settings associated with said user in response tosaid identifying step.